Using Remote and Proximal Sensing Data and Vine Vigor Parameters for Non-Destructive and Rapid Prediction of Grape Quality

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue22
dc.citation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorLyu H
dc.contributor.authorGrafton M
dc.contributor.authorRamilan T
dc.contributor.authorIrwin M
dc.contributor.authorWei H-E
dc.contributor.authorSandoval E
dc.contributor.editorZhang C
dc.contributor.editorLiu D
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T01:56:31Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T01:56:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-19
dc.description.abstractThe traditional method for determining wine grape total soluble solid (TSS) is destructive laboratory analysis, which is time consuming and expensive. In this study, we explore the potential of using different predictor variables from various advanced techniques to predict the grape TSS in a non-destructive and rapid way. Calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the vegetation indices (VIs) obtained from UAV multispectral imagery and grape TSS resulted in a strong correlation between OSAVI and grape TSS with a coefficient of 0.64. Additionally, seven machine learning models including ridge regression and lasso regression, k-Nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and artificial neural network (ANN) are used to build the prediction models. The predictor variables include the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) derived VIs, and other ancillary variables including normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI_proximal) and soil electrical conductivity (ECa) measured by proximal sensors, elevation, slope, trunk circumference, and day of the year for each sampling date. When using 23 VIs and other ancillary variables as input variables, the results show that ensemble learning models (RFR, and XGBoost) outperform other regression models when predicting grape TSS, with the average of root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.19 and 1.2 °Brix, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.52 and 0.52, respectively, during the 20 times testing process. In addition, this study examines the prediction performance of using optimized soil adjusted vegetation index (OSAVI) or normalized green-blue difference index (NGBDI) as the main input for different machine learning models with other ancillary variables. When using OSAVI-based models, the best prediction model is RFR with an average R2 of 0.51 and RMSE of 1.19 °Brix, respectively. For NGBDI-based model, the RFR model showed the best average result of predicting TSS were a R2 of 0.54 and a RMSE of 1.16 °Brix, respectively. The approach proposed in this study provides an opportunity to grape growers to estimate the whole vineyard grape TSS in a non-destructive way.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.editionNovember-2 2023
dc.identifier.citationLyu H, Grafton M, Ramilan T, Irwin M, Wei HE, Sandoval E. (2023). Using Remote and Proximal Sensing Data and Vine Vigor Parameters for Non-Destructive and Rapid Prediction of Grape Quality. Remote Sensing. 15. 22.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs15225412
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.number5412
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/72016
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMDPI (Basel, Switzerland)
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/22/5412
dc.relation.isPartOfRemote Sensing
dc.rights(c) 2023 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectwine grape
dc.subjectvegetation indices
dc.subjectUAV multispectral imagery
dc.subjectsugar content
dc.titleUsing Remote and Proximal Sensing Data and Vine Vigor Parameters for Non-Destructive and Rapid Prediction of Grape Quality
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id485144
pubs.organisational-groupCollege of Health
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Published version.pdf
Size:
5.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
485144 PDF.pdf
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles