Beyond BLASTing: How 3D structural prediction can support or refute BLAST results

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDaly TK
dc.contributor.authorSutherland-Smith AJ
dc.contributor.authorPenny ED
dc.coverage.spatialQueenstown, New Zealand
dc.date.available2015-09
dc.date.finish-date4/09/2015
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.date.start-date29/08/2015
dc.description.abstractBiologists know that not all BLAST results are homologs and that trees lose information at deep times. We have therefore developed a pipeline to bring increased confidence to the BLAST result. We use structural prediction to support or refute the inclusion of protein sequences into multiple sequence alignments. Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) together with structural prediction can be used to create seed sequences to help find remote homologs. The process can be used to help with annotation.
dc.identifier.citation2015
dc.identifier.elements-id256159
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10179/7716
dc.sourceQueenstown Research Week 2015
dc.titleBeyond BLASTing: How 3D structural prediction can support or refute BLAST results
dc.typeconference
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Sciences
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Sciences/School of Natural Sciences
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BLAST poster7.pdf
Size:
6.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Conference Posters