Lameness prevalence and management practices on Irish pasture-based dairy farms

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume75
dc.contributor.authorBrowne N
dc.contributor.authorHudson CD
dc.contributor.authorCrossley RE
dc.contributor.authorSugrue K
dc.contributor.authorKennedy E
dc.contributor.authorHuxley JN
dc.contributor.authorConneely M
dc.coverage.spatialIreland
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T01:17:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T06:51:55Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08
dc.date.available2023-12-04T01:17:06Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T06:51:55Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-08
dc.description.abstractBackground Lameness is a painful disease, which negatively impacts dairy cow production and welfare. The aim of this observational study was to determine herd lameness prevalence, describe current lameness management practices and identify the presence of established risk factors for lameness on Irish pasture-based dairy farms. Farms were visited once during grazing (99 farms) and again during housing (85 farms). Lameness scoring was carried out at each visit (AHDB 0–3 scale); cows were classified as lame if they scored two or three. Farm management practices and infrastructure characteristics were evaluated via farmer questionnaires and direct measurements of farm infrastructure. Results Median herd-level lameness prevalence was 7.9% (interquartile range = 5.6 – 13.0) during grazing and 9.1% (interquartile range = 4.9 – 12.0) during housing; 10.9% of cows were lame at a single visit and 3.5% were lame at both visits (chronically lame or had a repeat episode of lameness). Fifty-seven percent of farmers were not familiar with lameness scoring and only one farm carried out lameness scoring. Only 22% of farmers kept records of lame cows detected, and 15% had a lameness herd health plan. Twenty-eight percent of farmers waited more than 48 h to treat a lame cow, and 21% waited for more than one cow to be identified as lame before treating. Six percent of farmers carried out routine trimming and 31% regularly footbathed (> 12 times per year). Twelve percent put severely lame cows in a closer paddock and 8% stated that they used pain relief to treat severely lame cows. Over 50% of farms had at least one cow track measurement that was classified as rough or very rough, and cow tracks were commonly narrow for the herd size. On 6% of farms, all cubicle beds were bare concrete (no matting or bedding) and on a further 6% of farms, there was a combination of cubicles with and without matting or bedding. On 56% of farms, all pens contained less than 1.1 cubicles per cow and on 28% of farms, a proportion of pens contained less than 1.1 cubicles per cow. Conclusions Overall, this study identified infrastructure and management practices which could be improved upon. The comparatively low lameness prevalence demonstrated, compared to fully housed systems, also highlights the benefits of a pasture-based system for animal welfare; however, there remains scope for improvement.
dc.format.pagination14-
dc.identifier.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672794
dc.identifier.citationBrowne N, Hudson CD, Crossley RE, Sugrue K, Kennedy E, Huxley JN, Conneely M. (2022). Lameness prevalence and management practices on Irish pasture-based dairy farms.. Ir Vet J. 75. 1. (pp. 14-).
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13620-022-00221-w
dc.identifier.eissn2046-0481
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn0368-0762
dc.identifier.pii10.1186/s13620-022-00221-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/71056
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.isPartOfIr Vet J
dc.rights(c) 2022 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDairy cow
dc.subjectInfrastructure
dc.subjectLameness
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectWelfare
dc.titleLameness prevalence and management practices on Irish pasture-based dairy farms
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id454647
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
454647.pdf
Size:
2.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles