Recovery Capitals: a collaborative approach to post-disaster guidance

dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume36
dc.contributor.authorQuinn P
dc.contributor.authorGibbs L
dc.contributor.authorBlake D
dc.contributor.authorCampbell E
dc.contributor.authorJohnston D
dc.contributor.authorRichardson J
dc.contributor.authorCoghlan A
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T02:26:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T22:15:23Z
dc.date.available2023-09-13T02:26:15Z
dc.date.available2023-09-21T22:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-04
dc.date.updated2023-09-13T01:57:55Z
dc.description(c) 2022 The Author/sen_US
dc.description.abstractKnowledge from past disasters can inform and support recovery, yet these insights are not always readily accessible to recovery practitioners. To bridge this gap, effective collaboration is needed to produce practical, evidence-based resources. This was the focus of the Recovery Capitals (ReCap) project, a collaboration between researchers and practitioners across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. This paper presents a critical case study of the participatory processes involved in developing a recovery capitals framework and associated resources. The framework is based on an existing Community Capitals Framework that emphasises the social, natural, political, built, human, financial and cultural strengths and resources within communities. The Recovery Capitals Framework arose through applying the Community Capitals Framework to disaster recovery, with conceptual adaptations to reflect shared values, diverse perspectives and collective knowledge of recovery. The lessons learnt from this international and researcher-practitioner collaboration are analysed, and the application of principles of equity, inclusion and community-led recovery is evaluated. Shortcomings and innovations are examined in how resources were tailored to the cultural contexts of each country, and reflections are presented from the perspectives Indigenous and non-Indigenous contributors. These lessons can inform future collaborations that support inclusive, holistic and evidence-informed recovery efforts.
dc.format.extent52-61
dc.identifier.citationQuinn P, Gibbs L, Blake D, Campbell E, Johnston D, Richardson J, Coghlan A. (2022). Recovery Capitals: a collaborative approach to post-disaster guidance. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 36. 2. (pp. 52-61).
dc.identifier.doi10.47389/37.2.52
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.identifier.issn1324-1540
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/20153
dc.publisherAustralian Institute for Disaster Resilience
dc.relation.isPartOfAustralian Journal of Emergency Management
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleRecovery Capitals: a collaborative approach to post-disaster guidance
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id453415
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
453415.pdf
Size:
810.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections