Cross-cultural measurement validation: an analysis of dissent, workplace freedom of speech, and perceived immediacy

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume41
dc.contributor.authorCroucher SM
dc.contributor.authorKelly S
dc.contributor.authorAshwell D
dc.contributor.authorCondon S
dc.contributor.authorTootell B
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T00:57:11Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01T00:57:11Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-12
dc.description.abstractCroucher and Kelly (2019) laid out guidelines to develop measures that can be used across cultures. The present study provides support for their guidelines, indicating that pancultural measurements cannot be behavioral and should not include unnecessary contexts; however, they should be worded as simplistically as possible. This study utilizes measures of dissent, perceived immediacy, and workplace freedom of speech in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Only the perceived immediacy measure, which follows Croucher and Kelly’s (2019) guidelines, maintained internal consistency.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.format.pagination71-81
dc.identifier.citationCroucher SM, Kelly S, Ashwell D, Condon S, Tootell B. (2024). Cross-cultural measurement validation: an analysis of dissent, workplace freedom of speech, and perceived immediacy. Communication Research Reports. 41. 2. (pp. 71-81).
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08824096.2024.2327545
dc.identifier.eissn1746-4099
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn0882-4096
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/70045
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group on behalf of the Eastern Communication Association
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08824096.2024.2327545
dc.relation.isPartOfCommunication Research Reports
dc.rights(c) 2024 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.subjectvalidity
dc.subjectculture
dc.subjectpancultural
dc.titleCross-cultural measurement validation: an analysis of dissent, workplace freedom of speech, and perceived immediacy
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id487166
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Published version.pdf
Size:
671.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
487166 PDF.pdf
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles