Acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among never- and under-screened Indigenous and other minority women: a randomised three-arm community trial in Aotearoa New Zealand.
dc.citation.volume | 16 | |
dc.contributor.author | Brewer N | |
dc.contributor.author | Bartholomew K | |
dc.contributor.author | Grant J | |
dc.contributor.author | Maxwell A | |
dc.contributor.author | McPherson G | |
dc.contributor.author | Wihongi H | |
dc.contributor.author | Bromhead C | |
dc.contributor.author | Scott N | |
dc.contributor.author | Crengle S | |
dc.contributor.author | Foliaki S | |
dc.contributor.author | Cunningham C | |
dc.contributor.author | Douwes J | |
dc.contributor.author | Potter JD | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Internationally, self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to increase participation in cervical-cancer screening. In Aotearoa New Zealand, there are long-standing ethnic inequalities in cervical-cancer screening, incidence, and mortality, particularly for indigenous Māori women, as well as Pacific and Asian women. METHODS: We invited never- and markedly under-screened (≥5 years overdue) 30-69-year-old Māori, Pacific, and Asian women to participate in an open-label, three-arm, community-based, randomised controlled trial, with a nested sub-study. We aimed to assess whether two specific invitation methods for self-sampling improved screening participation over usual care among the least medically served populations. Women were individually randomised 3:3:1 to: clinic-based self-sampling (CLINIC - invited to take a self-sample at their usual general practice); home-based self-sampling (HOME - mailed a kit and invited to take a self-sample at home); and usual care (USUAL - invited to attend a clinic for collection of a standard cytology sample). Neither participants nor research staff could be blinded to the intervention. In a subset of general practices, women who did not participate within three months of invitation were opportunistically invited to take a self-sample, either next time they attended a clinic or by mail. FINDINGS: We randomised 3,553 women: 1,574 to CLINIC, 1,467 to HOME, and 512 to USUAL. Participation was highest in HOME (14.6% among Māori, 8.8% among Pacific, and 18.5% among Asian) with CLINIC (7.0%, 5.3% and 6.9%, respectively) and USUAL (2.0%, 1.7% and 4.5%, respectively) being lower. In fully adjusted models, participation was statistically significantly more likely in HOME than USUAL: Māori OR=9.7, (95%CI 3.0-31.5); Pacific OR=6.0 (1.8-19.5); and Asian OR=5.1 (2.4-10.9). There were no adverse outcomes reported. After three months, 2,780 non-responding women were invited to participate in a non-randomised, opportunistic, follow-on substudy. After 6 months,192 (6.9%) additional women had taken a self-sample. INTERPRETATION: Using recruitment methods that mimic usual practice, we provide critical evidence that self-sampling increases screening among the groups of women (never and under-screened) who experience the most barriers in Aotearoa New Zealand, although the absolute level of participation through this population approach was modest. Follow-up for most women was routine but a small proportion required intensive support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12618000367246 (date registered 12/3/2018) https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371741&isReview=true; UTN: U1111-1189-0531. FUNDING: Health Research Council of New Zealand (HRC 16/405). PROTOCOL: http://publichealth.massey.ac.nz/assets/Uploads/Study-protocol-V2.1Self-sampling-for-HPV-screening-a-community-trial.pdf. | |
dc.description.publication-status | Published | |
dc.identifier | http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000747572000017&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=c5bb3b2499afac691c2e3c1a83ef6fef | |
dc.identifier | ARTN 100265 | |
dc.identifier.citation | LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2021, 16 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100265 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2666-6065 | |
dc.identifier.elements-id | 448743 | |
dc.identifier.harvested | Massey_Dark | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10179/16654 | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC | |
dc.subject | Cervical screening | |
dc.subject | Self-sampling | |
dc.subject | HPV DNA testing | |
dc.subject | Indigenous | |
dc.subject | minorities | |
dc.title | Acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among never- and under-screened Indigenous and other minority women: a randomised three-arm community trial in Aotearoa New Zealand. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.notes | Not known | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/College of Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/College of Health/Research Centre for Hauora and Health | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/College of Health/School of Health Science |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Brewer et al 2021.pdf
- Size:
- 1.24 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: