Browsing by Author "Mead SR"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Probabilistic volcanic mass flow hazard assessment using statistical surrogates of deterministic simulations
    (Elsevier Ltd., 2023-09-01) Mead SR; Procter J; Bebbington M
    Probabilistic volcanic hazard assessments require (1) an identification of the hazardous volcanic source; (2) estimation of the magnitude-frequency relationship for the volcanic process; (3) quantification of the dependence of hazard on magnitude and external conditions; and (4) estimation of hazard exceedance from the magnitude-frequency and hazard intensity relationship. For volcanic mass flows, quantification of the hazard is typically undertaken through the use of computationally expensive mass flow simulators. However, this computational expense restricts the number of samples that can be used to produce a probabilistic assessment and limits the ability to rapidly update hazard assessments in response to changing source probabilities. We develop an alternate approach to defining hazard intensity through a surrogate model that provides a continuous estimate of simulation outputs at negligible computational expense, demonstrated through a probabilistic hazard assessment of dome collapse (block-and-ash) flows at Taranaki volcano, New Zealand. A Gaussian Process emulator trained on a database of simulations is used as the surrogate model of hazard intensity across the input space of possible dome collapse volumes and configurations, which is then sampled using a volume-frequency relationship of dome collapse flows. The demonstrated technique is a tractable solution to the problem of probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment, with the surrogates providing a good approximation of the simulator, and is generally applicable to volcanic hazard and geo-hazard assessments that are limited by the demands of numerical simulations and changing source probabilities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations
    (Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union, 2021-08-20) Mead SR; Procter J; Kereszturi G
    The use of mass flow simulations in volcanic hazard zonation and mapping is often limited by model complexity (i.e. uncertainty in correct values of model parameters), a lack of model uncertainty quantification, and limited approaches to incorporate this uncertainty into hazard maps. When quantified, mass flow simulation errors are typically evaluated on a pixel-pair basis, using the difference between simulated and observed ("actual") map-cell values to evaluate the performance of a model. However, these comparisons conflate location and quantification errors, neglecting possible spatial autocorrelation of evaluated errors. As a result, model performance assessments typically yield moderate accuracy values. In this paper, similarly moderate accuracy values were found in a performance assessment of three depth-averaged numerical models using the 2012 debris avalanche from the Upper Te Maari crater, Tongariro Volcano, as a benchmark. To provide a fairer assessment of performance and evaluate spatial covariance of errors, we use a fuzzy set approach to indicate the proximity of similarly valued map cells. This "fuzzification"of simulated results yields improvements in targeted performance metrics relative to a length scale parameter at the expense of decreases in opposing metrics (e.g. fewer false negatives result in more false positives) and a reduction in resolution. The use of this approach to generate hazard zones incorporating the identified uncertainty and associated trade-offs is demonstrated and indicates a potential use for informed stakeholders by reducing the complexity of uncertainty estimation and supporting decision-making from simulated data.