Browsing by Author "Hendriks SJ"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Associations between peripartum lying and activity behaviour and blood non-esterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate in grazing dairy cows
    (Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium, 2022-03) Hendriks SJ; Phyn CVC; Turner S-A; Mueller KR; Kuhn-Sherlock B; Donaghy DJ; Huzzey JM; Roche JR
    During early lactation, most dairy cows experience negative energy balance (NEB). Failure to cope with this NEB, however, can place cows at greater risk of developing metabolic disease. Our objective was to characterise, retrospectively, lying behaviour and activity of grazing dairy cows grouped according to blood non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) as indicators of postpartum metabolic state. Blood was sampled weekly for up to 4 weeks precalving, on the day of calving (day 0), daily between 1 and 4 days postcalving, and then at least weekly between week 1 and week 5 postcalving for analysis of plasma NEFAs and BHB concentrations. Two hundred and forty-four multiparous Holstein-Friesian and Holstein-Friesian × Jersey cows were classified into one of three metabolic status groups based on maximum blood NEFAs and BHB concentrations during week 1 and 2 postcalving. A cow was classified as having either: (1) low NEFAs and low BHB (Lo–Lo; n = 78), when all blood samples were <1.0 mmol/L for NEFAs and ≤1.0 mmol/L for BHB during the first 2 weeks postcalving; (2) high NEFAs and low BHB (Hi–Lo; n = 134), when blood NEFAs were ≥1.0 mmol/L and blood BHB was ≤1.0 mmol/L at the same sampling time point during the first 2 weeks postcalving; or (3) high NEFAs and high BHB (Hi–Hi; n = 32), when blood NEFAs were ≥1.0 mmol/L and blood BHB was ≥1.2 mmol/L at the same sampling time point during the first 2 weeks postcalving. Accelerometers (IceTag or IceQube devices; IceRobotics Ltd.) were used to monitor lying and activity behaviours peripartum (–21 to +35 days relative to calving). Changes in lying behaviour and activity occurred before the mean day that cows were classified Hi–Hi and Hi–Lo (2.2 and 3.5 d postcalving, respectively). Up to 3 weeks preceding calving, Hi–Hi cows were more active, had fewer daily lying bouts (LBs), and spent less time lying than Lo–Lo cows. In addition, Hi–Hi cows had fewer daily LBs and were less active up to 4 weeks postcalving than Lo–Lo cows, but these differences were biologically small. Groups of grazing cows classified as experiencing a more severe metabolic challenge behave differently up to 3 weeks precalving than their herdmates with lower blood NEFAs and BHB postcalving. These altered behaviours may allow identification of individual cows at risk of a metabolic challenge, but further research is required.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Supplementation of urea to a basal pasture diet fed to dairy cows to model N-partitioning relationships
    (Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association, 2021-01-01) Hendriks SJ; Lopez-Villalobos N; Sheahan AJ; Donaghy DJ; Roche JR
    The main objective of this study was to investigate whether altering dietary crude protein (CP) through the supplementation of urea to a basal pasture diet fed to dairy cows accurately modeled N-partitioning relationships. To test this, we first needed to establish safe tolerance levels for urea in this setting. Fifteen multiparous, rumen-fistulated, mid-lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cows were offered spring pasture (~20 kg of dry matter/cow per day) and allocated to 1 of 3 urea supplementation treatments: low N [0 g/d urea; 21% total dietary CP of dry matter (DM)], medium N (350 g/d urea; 26% total dietary CP of DM), or high N (690 g/d urea; 31% total dietary CP of DM), in a completely randomized design. The amount of urea provided daily increased gradually for all cows over a 21-d period, with target urea supplementation reached by d 21. Milk yield decreased linearly at a rate of 2.35 kg/100 g of urea intake when urea supplementation exceeded 350 g/d for 4 d (~2% of DM intake). Cows from the low- and medium-N treatments subsequently entered metabolism stalls from d 25 to 31 to collect urine, feces, and milk for total N collection. Estimated urinary N output (g/d) increased linearly with N intake (g/d), and the slope of the relationship (slope = 0.86; R2 = 0.82) was consistent with international published results. Because of the consistency of our results with previously documented relationships, our findings indicate that supplementation of urea to a basal pasture diet is a suitable technique for modeling different N intakes from pasture diets to evaluate urinary N mitigation strategies. Urea supplementation, however, should not exceed ~2% of DM intake.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of prepartum synthetic zeolite supplementation on the eating, lying and activity behaviours of grazing dairy cows
    (Taylor and Francis Group on behalf of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2024) Dalton JI; Hendriks SJ; Roche JR; Donaghy DJ; Dela Rue B; Kuhn-Sherlock B; Phyn CVC; Corner-Thomas R
    This study determined the effect of feeding synthetic zeolite A prepartum to reduce periparturient hypocalcaemia risk on the eating, lying, and activity behaviours of multiparous grazing dairy cows. Animals were randomly allocated to either a Zeolite treatment group (n = 21; individually fed 500 g/d zeolite for two weeks prepartum) or a Control group (n = 22). Behaviour data obtained from accelerometers were analysed to determine the effects of treatment, parity (Parity 2−3 vs. 4+), and their interactions during 3 periods: PRE (−21 to −3 d), PERI (−2–2 d) and POST (3–28 d) relative to the day of calving (day 0). Parity 2–3 Zeolite cows ate for 18 min/day less than Parity 2–3 Control cows PRE. Zeolite-fed cows also ate for 24 min/day less than Control cows during the PERI period. There were no treatment differences in lying time or activity PRE or PERI, but Zeolite-fed cows spent more time lying POST. Regardless of treatment, Parity 2–3 cows were generally more active and ate for longer than Parity 4 + cows. Our results suggest zeolite may subtly decrease appetite or alter eating behaviour during the supplementation period, particularly in younger cows, and may improve cow comfort postcalving.